This story was initially printed by Grist. Join Grist’s weekly newsletter here.
Earlier this 12 months, the e-commerce company Amazon secured approval to open two new data centers in Santiago, Chile. The $400 million enterprise is the corporate’s first foray into finding its knowledge amenities, which guzzle huge quantities of electrical energy and water in an effort to energy cloud computing providers and on-line packages, in Latin America — and in some of the water-stressed international locations on the planet, the place residents have protested against the industry’s expansion.
This week, the tech big made a separate however associated announcement. It plans to put money into water conservation alongside the Maipo River, which is the first supply of water for the Santiago area. Amazon will accomplice with a water expertise startup to assist farmers alongside the river set up drip irrigation methods on 165 acres of farmland. The plan is poised to preserve sufficient water to provide round 300 houses per 12 months, and it’s a part of Amazon’s marketing campaign to make its cloud computing operations “water constructive” by 2030, that means the corporate’s internet providers division will preserve or replenish extra water than it makes use of up.
The reasoning behind this water initiative is evident: Knowledge facilities require giant quantities of water to chill their servers, and Amazon plans to spend $100 billion to construct extra of them over the subsequent decade as a part of a giant guess on its Amazon Net Providers cloud-computing platform. Different tech firms similar to Microsoft and Meta, that are additionally investing in knowledge facilities to maintain the artificial-intelligence growth, have made similar water pledges amid a rising controversy concerning the sector’s thirst for water and energy.
Amazon claims that its knowledge facilities are already among the many most water-efficient within the trade, and it plans to roll out extra conservation tasks to mitigate its thirst. Nonetheless, similar to company pledges to achieve “net-zero” emissions, these water pledges are extra advanced than they appear at first look. Whereas the corporate has certainly taken steps to chop water utilization at its amenities, its calculations don’t account for the huge water wants of the facility crops that maintain the lights on at these exact same amenities. With out a bigger dedication to mitigating Amazon’s underlying stress on electrical energy grids, conservation efforts by the corporate and its fellow tech giants will solely deal with a part of the issue, in line with specialists who spoke to Grist.
The highly effective servers in giant knowledge facilities run scorching as they course of unprecedented quantities of data, and maintaining them from overheating requires each water and electrical energy. Reasonably than attempt to maintain these rooms cool with conventional air-conditioning models, many firms use water as a coolant, operating it previous the servers to sit back them out. The facilities additionally want big quantities of electrical energy to run all their servers: They already account for round 3 p.c of U.S. energy demand, a quantity that would more than double by 2030. On high of that, the coal, gasoline, and nuclear energy crops that produce that electrical energy themselves devour even bigger portions of water to remain cool.
Will Hewes, who leads water sustainability for Amazon Net Providers, instructed Grist that the corporate makes use of water in its knowledge facilities in an effort to save on energy-intensive air-con models, thus decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels.
“Utilizing water for cooling in most locations actually reduces the quantity of power that we use, and so it helps us meet different sustainability objectives,” he mentioned. “We may all the time resolve to not use water for cooling, however we need to, rather a lot, due to these power and effectivity advantages.”
So as to save on power prices, the corporate’s knowledge facilities must evaporate thousands and thousands of gallons of water per 12 months. It’s arduous to say for certain how a lot water the info heart trade consumes, however the ballpark estimates are substantial. One 2021 examine found that U.S. knowledge facilities consumed round 415,000 acre-feet of water in 2018, even earlier than the artificial-intelligence growth. That’s sufficient to provide round 1,000,000 common houses yearly, or about as a lot as California’s Imperial Valley takes from the Colorado River every year to develop winter greens. One other examine discovered that knowledge facilities operated by Microsoft, Google, and Meta withdrew twice as a lot water from rivers and aquifers as all the nation of Denmark.
It’s nearly sure that this quantity has ballooned even greater in recent times as firms have constructed extra facilities to maintain up with the artificial-intelligence growth, since AI packages similar to ChatGPT require huge quantities of server actual property. Tech firms have constructed lots of of latest knowledge facilities in the previous couple of years alone, and they’re planning lots of extra. One current estimate discovered that ChatGPT requires an average-sized bottle of water for each 10 to 50 chat responses it gives. The on-site water consumption at any considered one of these firms’ knowledge facilities may now rival that of a major beverage company similar to PepsiCo.
Amazon doesn’t present statistics on its absolute water consumption; Hewes instructed Grist the corporate is “centered on effectivity.” Nonetheless, the tech big’s water utilization is probably going decrease than a few of its opponents — partly as a result of the corporate has constructed most of its knowledge facilities with so-called evaporative cooling methods, which require far much less water than different cooling applied sciences and solely activate when temperatures get too excessive. The corporate pegs its water utilization at round 10 p.c of the trade common, and in temperate places similar to Sweden, it doesn’t use any water to chill down knowledge facilities besides throughout peak summer time temperatures.
Corporations can cut back the environmental affect of their AI enterprise by constructing them in temperate areas which have loads of water, however they need to stability these effectivity issues with issues about land and electrical energy prices, in addition to the must be near main prospects. Current research have discovered that data center water consumption in the U.S. is “skewed towards water pressured subbasins” in locations just like the Southwest, however Amazon has clustered much of its business farther east, particularly in Virginia, which boasts cheap power and monetary incentives for tech corporations.
“Numerous the places are pushed by buyer wants, but additionally by [prices for] actual property and energy,” mentioned Hewes. “Some massive parts of our knowledge heart footprint are in locations that aren’t tremendous scorching, that aren’t in tremendous water pressured areas. Virginia, Ohio — they get scorching in the summertime, however then there are massive chunks of the 12 months the place we don’t want to make use of water for cooling.” Even so, the corporate’s growth in Virginia is already inflicting issues over water availability.
To mitigate its impacts in such basins, the corporate additionally funds dozens of conservation and recharge tasks just like the one in Chile. It donates recycled water from its knowledge facilities to farmers, who use it to irrigate their crops, and it has additionally helped restore the rivers that provide water-stressed cities similar to Cape Town, South Africa; in northern Virginia, it has labored to install cover crop farmland that may cut back runoff air pollution in native waterways. The corporate treats these tasks the best way different firms deal with carbon offsets, counting every gallon recharged towards a gallon it consumes at its knowledge facilities. Amazon mentioned in its most recent sustainability report that it’s 41 p.c of the best way to assembly its objective of being “water constructive.” In different phrases, it has funded tasks that recharge or preserve somewhat over 4 gallons of water for each 10 gallons of water it makes use of.
However regardless of all this, the corporate’s water stewardship objective doesn’t embrace the water consumed by the facility crops that provide its knowledge facilities. This consumption might be as a lot as three to 10 instances as giant because the on-site water consumption at an information heart, in line with Shaolei Ren, a professor of engineering on the College of California, Riverside, who research knowledge heart water utilization. For instance, Ren pointed to an Amazon data center in Pennsylvania that depends on a nuclear power plant less than a mile away. That knowledge heart makes use of round 20 p.c of the facility plant’s capability.
“They are saying they’re utilizing little or no water, however there’s a giant water evaporation occurring simply close by, and that’s for powering their knowledge heart,” he mentioned.
Corporations like Amazon can cut back this secondary water utilization by counting on renewable power sources, which don’t require anyplace close to as a lot water as conventional energy crops. Hewes says the corporate has been making an attempt to “handle down” each water and power wants by means of a separate objective of working on 100 percent renewable energy, however Ren factors out that the corporate’s knowledge facilities want round the clock energy, which suggests intermittently out there renewables like photo voltaic and wind farms can solely go thus far.
Amazon isn’t the one firm coping with this drawback. CyrusOne, one other main knowledge heart agency, revealed in its sustainability report earlier this 12 months that it used greater than eight instances as a lot water to supply energy because it did on-site at its knowledge facilities.
“So long as we’re reliant on grid electrical energy that features thermoelectric sources to energy our amenities, we’re not directly liable for the consumption of huge quantities of water within the manufacturing of that electrical energy,” the report mentioned.
As for replenishment tasks just like the one in Chile, they too will solely go a part of the best way towards decreasing the affect of the info heart explosion. Even when Amazon’s cloud operations are “water constructive” on a worldwide scale, with tasks in lots of the identical basins the place it owns knowledge facilities, that doesn’t imply it received’t nonetheless compromise water entry in particular watersheds. The corporate’s knowledge facilities and their energy crops should still withdraw extra water than the corporate replenishes in a given space, and replenishment tasks in different aquifers world wide received’t deal with the bodily penalties of that particular overdraft.
“If they’re able to seize among the rising water and clear it and return to the neighborhood, that’s higher than nothing, however I feel it’s probably not decreasing the precise consumption,” Ren mentioned. “It masks out loads of actual issues, as a result of water is a very regional concern.”
Correction: This story has been corrected to make clear that Amazon’s “water constructive” pledge applies solely to its internet providers division.
This text initially appeared in Grist. Grist is a nonprofit, unbiased media group devoted to telling tales of local weather options and a simply future. Be taught extra at Grist.org.
Trending Merchandise
